Representations of algebraic tori
Posted by martin on Wednesday, 03 March 2010 at 10:08
I am finally ready to finish my series on algebraic tori, by talking about their representations. I shall show that these representations can be classified by a grading on the vector space of the representation, after extending scalars to the separable closure. I will describe this classification explicitly in a simple case.
Representations of split tori
A representation of an algebraic group
over
is a finite-dimensional
-vector space
together with a homomorphism of algebraic groups
.
The representations of a split torus are easy to understand: every representation of a split torus is a direct sum of characters. This is analogous to the fact that every representation of a finite abelian group is a direct sum of characters. It can be proved from the fact that the characters form a basis for the Hopf algebra.
Recall that the character group of a split torus of rank
is
.
So a representation
of a split torus is just a
-graded
-vector space:

where
acts on
as multiplication by
.
(The minus signs here are just a convention.)
Conversely, any
-graded
-vector space gives rise to a representation of
,
by the above formula.
We call the graded pieces
(for
) weight spaces and the characters
for which
is non-zero weights of
.
Representations of non-split tori
Now let
be an arbitrary torus over any field
, and let
be a representation of
.
Just as with representations of finite groups, to properly understand representations over non-algebraically closed fields, you need to analyse them over an algebraic (or at least separable) closure to ensure that all the eigenvalues exist.
So we will extend scalars and look at
.
As we saw in the previous section, such a
corresponds to a
-grading on
.
Of course not all
-gradings on
give rise to representations defined over
.
is defined over
iff it commutes with the semilinear
-actions on
and
.
The Galois action on
is induced by the semilinear Galois action on
.
Chasing the actions around, we find that if
is defined over
and
acts on
as
, then
must act on
as
.
Hence the action of
on
must permute the weight spaces according to the action of
on
:

Conversely, if the above relation holds for all
, then because the weight spaces span
it follows that the representation is defined over
.
So we get an equivalence of categories between { representations of
(defined over
) } and
{ finite-dimensional
-vector spaces
with a
-grading on
such that
for all
}.
An example: the circle group
The category I have just described of vector spaces with a grading sounds rather complicated so I had better give an example. Really I should have given some examples of character groups of non-split tori already.
For these examples I shall take
.
The non-trivial element of
will be denoted
.
There are two rank 1 tori over
, corresponding to the two actions of
on
.
Either
acts as the identity, and we get the split torus
;
or
acts as -1, and we get a torus whose
-points are
. The latter torus is sometimes called the circle group, because its real points form a circle, and is denoted
.
Let
be a representation of
.
Then
with
.
For
a positive integer, let
be the subspace of
fixed by
,
and let
be the the subspace of
fixed by
.
Then
are real vector spaces, with
and
.
Fix a basis
of
and let
and
.
Then the
form a real basis of
, and
acts on each 2-dimensional subspace
as rotation by
.