Posted by martin on
Thursday, 03 January 2013 at 15:51
Today I will discuss the classification of endomorphism algebras of simple abelian varieties.
The endomorphism algebra of a non-simple abelian variety can easily be computed from the endomorphism algebras of its simple factors.
For a simple abelian variety, its endomorphism algebra is a division algebra of finite dimension over 
.
(A division algebra is a not-necessarily-commutative algebra in which every non-zero element is invertible.)
As discussed last time, the endomorphism algebra also has a positive involution, the Rosati involution.
There may be many Rosati involutions, coming from different polarisations of the abelian variety, but all we care about today is the existence of a positive involution.
Division algebras with positive involutions were classified by Albert in the 1930s.
Tags abelian-varieties, alg-geom, maths
Read more...
Posted by martin on
Wednesday, 05 December 2012 at 16:04
I intend to return to the basic theory of abelian varieties and write write a few posts on their endomorphism algebras and associated moduli spaces.
To begin with, I will discuss the Rosati involution which is an involution of the endomorphism algebra coming from a polarisation.
The existence of such an involution is crucial for the classification of endomorphism algebras which I will discuss next.
Tags abelian-varieties, alg-geom, maths
Read more...
Posted by martin on
Thursday, 04 October 2012 at 17:41
The computing scientist Edsger Dijkstra did not like the standard formulation of the pigeonhole principle:
If 
compartments contain 
objects, then at least one compartment contains at least two objects.
He preferred:
For a non-empty, finite bag of numbers, the maximum value is at least the average value.
Of course there are times when Dijkstra’s principle is preferable to the traditional statement above (and to its generalisation which I will state below) but I think that there are also times when the traditional statement is preferable, and I am going to counter some of Dijkstra’s arguments below.
These come from EWD980 and EWD1094.
I am thinking about this today because I am going to teach the pigeonhole principle to some sixth formers at the Maths Olympiad Club at Orsay on Saturday, and I have already taught it twice at the National Mathematics Summer School in Birmingham.
Tags maths, nmss, teaching
Read more...
Posted by martin on
Thursday, 20 September 2012 at 17:39
I recently had to write an account of my research for a non-specialist. I think I took it more seriously than necessary – I am not sure that anyone will read it. But it might interest some readers of this blog, so I shall put it here. I have just put the paper containing this work on Arxiv.
Tags alg-geom, maths, shimura-varieties
Read more...
Posted by martin on
Friday, 03 August 2012 at 11:06
Today I will explain how to prove the Masser-Wüstholz Period Theorem starting from the Key Proposition, an weaker existence result for abelian subvarieties of bounded degrees. The Key Proposition and the Tangent Space Lemma, which I mention briefly, are the main results proved by Masser and Wüstholz by the techniques of transcendental number theory on their way to the Period Theorem.
Recall that the Period Theorem is a bound for the degree of the smallest abelian subvariety of 
whose tangent space contains a given period 
. In the Key Proposition we find a subvariety of bounded degree whose tangent space satisfies the very weak condition of being inside a chosen hyperplane in 
.
In particular need not be in the tangent space of the subvariety.
However we use the Key Proposition and induction to prove the Strong Proposition, which gives a subvariety whose tangent space does contain .
Several applications of the Strong Proposition with different hyperplanes in prove the Period Theorem.
Tags abelian-varieties, alg-geom, maths, number-theory
Read more...