Posted by Martin Orr on
Thursday, 17 November 2011 at 15:58
The Faltings height is a real number attached to an abelian variety (defined over a number field), which is at the centre of Faltings' proof of Finiteness Theorem I.
In this post all I will do is define the Faltings height of an abelian variety over 
, as already this requires a lot of preliminaries on cotangent and canonical sheaves of schemes.
Further complications arise over other base fields, which I will discuss next time.
For an abelian variety 
over 
, the Faltings height is the (logarithm of the) volume of 
as a complex manifold with respect to a particular volume form, chosen using the 
-structure of 
.
The preliminaries are needed in order to choose the volume form.
Faltings' proof of Finiteness I proceeds by showing that for any fixed number field, there are finitely many abelian varieties of bounded Faltings height.
This is done by showing that the Faltings height is not far away from the classical height of a point representing the abelian variety in the moduli space 
.
Then he shows that the Faltings height is bounded within an isogeny class.
Both of these parts are difficult.
Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, faltings, maths, number-theory
Read more...
Posted by Martin Orr on
Monday, 19 September 2011 at 16:34
Faltings famously proved the Mordell, Shafarevich and Tate conjectures in 1983.
In this post I will discuss the relationships between the Tate and Shafarevich conjectures and some other finiteness theorems for abelian varieties.
Everything which I call a conjecture in this post is known to be true:
they all follow from Finiteness Theorem I.
Proving Finiteness Theorem I was the bulk of Faltings' work, but I am not going to talk about that today.
Finiteness Theorem I.
Given a number field 
and an abelian variety 
defined over 
,
there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of abelian varieties defined over 
and isogenous to 
.
Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, faltings, maths, number-theory
Read more...
Posted by Martin Orr on
Tuesday, 06 September 2011 at 13:52
Last time, we defined a pairing

By composing this with a polarisation, we get a pairing of 
with itself.
This pairing is symplectic; the proof of this will occupy most of the post.
We will also see that the action of the Galois group on this pairing is given by the (inverse of the) cyclotomic character,
as I promised a long time ago (in the comments).
This tells us that the image of the 
-adic Galois representation of 
is contained in 
.
This is the end of my series on Mumford-Tate groups and 
-adic representations attached to abelian varieties.
Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, hodge, maths, number-theory
Read more...