Posted by Martin Orr on
Friday, 30 March 2012 at 12:20

I wanted to write a post about the Masser-Wüstholz isogeny theorem, which gives a quantitative version of Finiteness Theorem I.
But it turned out to be too long so for today I will focus on the main ingredient in the proof of the isogeny theorem: the Masser-Wüstholz period theorem.

The period theorem gives a bound for the degree of the smallest abelian subvariety of a fixed abelian variety

having a given period of

in its tangent space.
In this post I will explain the statement of the period theorem, in particular defining the degree of a (polarised) abelian variety, and give some properties of the degree which will be used in the proof of the isogeny theorem.

**Period Theorem.** (Masser, Wüstholz 1993) Let

be an abelian variety defined over a number field

with a principal polarisation

.
For any non-zero period

of

, the smallest abelian subvariety

of

whose tangent space contains

satisfies

where

and

are constants depending only on

.

Masser and Wüstholz gave a value for

of

where

.
For myself, I am only interested in the existence of such a bound, but work has been done on improving it.
If I correctly understand a recent preprint of Gaudron and Rémond, they show that

suffices.

Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, maths, number-theory
Read more...

Posted by Martin Orr on
Saturday, 31 December 2011 at 15:31

In this post I shall give the definition of the Faltings height of an abelian variety over any number field.
Last time we did this over

only, and we used two properties of

: the integers are a PID and there is only one archimedean place.
To do things more generally, we will introduce the technology of normed modules and their degrees.

Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, faltings, maths, number-theory
Read more...

Posted by Martin Orr on
Thursday, 17 November 2011 at 15:58

The Faltings height is a real number attached to an abelian variety (defined over a number field), which is at the centre of Faltings' proof of Finiteness Theorem I.
In this post all I will do is define the Faltings height of an abelian variety over

, as already this requires a lot of preliminaries on cotangent and canonical sheaves of schemes.
Further complications arise over other base fields, which I will discuss next time.

For an abelian variety

over

, the Faltings height is the (logarithm of the) volume of

as a complex manifold with respect to a particular volume form, chosen using the

-structure of

.
The preliminaries are needed in order to choose the volume form.

Faltings' proof of Finiteness I proceeds by showing that for any fixed number field, there are finitely many abelian varieties of bounded Faltings height.
This is done by showing that the Faltings height is not far away from the classical height of a point representing the abelian variety in the moduli space

.
Then he shows that the Faltings height is bounded within an isogeny class.
Both of these parts are difficult.

Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, faltings, maths, number-theory
Read more...

Posted by Martin Orr on
Monday, 19 September 2011 at 16:34

Faltings famously proved the Mordell, Shafarevich and Tate conjectures in 1983.
In this post I will discuss the relationships between the Tate and Shafarevich conjectures and some other finiteness theorems for abelian varieties.

Everything which I call a conjecture in this post is known to be true:
they all follow from Finiteness Theorem I.
Proving Finiteness Theorem I was the bulk of Faltings' work, but I am not going to talk about that today.

**Finiteness Theorem I.**
Given a number field

and an abelian variety

defined over

,
there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of abelian varieties defined over

and isogenous to

.

Tags
abelian-varieties, alg-geom, faltings, maths, number-theory
Read more...